Welcome to Productivity Central.

This site is devoted to improving the productivity, profitability, safety and sustainability of your business. I hope you find it informational and entertaining. Please bookmark the site and come back often.

Also, be sure to check out my companion blog at http://MarComCentral.blogspot.com/ for information, ideas and tools to improve your sales and marketing efforts.
My photo
West Bend, WI, United States

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Taking meetings from productivity sinkhole to profit and customer satisfaction engine

Does the word “meeting’ make you cringe? Do you hear groans and gnashing of teeth from your employees every time another one is scheduled? Do you get to the point where you feel your world revolves around meetings? It seems that some companies have meetings to set up meetings to discuss the fact that they have too many meetings. If it seems that all you do is run from meeting to meeting, then what are you actually accomplishing? How much of your precious time is absorbed into the black hole of perpetual meetings?


I hate to be the one to break it to you, but business does not exist for the sake of meetings. Business exists to serve customers and it is pretty hard to do that when your people are too busy with meetings to answer the #$@%& phone. Don’t get me wrong. There is a time for meetings, but that time is not M-F 8AM to 5PM each and every week.


Just think about this. If you have just 4 meetings a week with 5 participants each, you are tying up over 1000 man-hours per year. Are you getting 1000 hours worth of productivity improvements for your time? Are you saving any money as a result of that investment? Are you even recouping the labor cost for the time employees spend sitting around a conference table? Now think about how many meetings actually take place in a given week at your company and how many employees are typically involved. I will let you do your own math, but please sit down before you add it up.


With organizations cut to the bone to stay afloat, it is unconscionable to have the best employees constantly tied up in meetings. With fewer employees to carry the workload, their time is an asset you cannot afford to squander.


Not every discussion requires a formal meeting and not every meeting needs to take an hour out of 5-10 employees’ day. Coaches in professional football spend lots of time in meetings, but when it comes to game-time, they focus on the game. In real time, they evaluate how their strategies are working and make refinements to tactics. They don’t stop and call another meeting. If they did, the opponent would score a touchdown before they settled into their chairs. Instead, they get with a few key players for a brief sideline discussion and then get back to the business at hand.


Right now, the business at hand is retaining your existing customers (customers whom your competition would love to court away), and bringing on new customers (customers who are likely already committed to another supplier). Both call for outstanding customer service, which you cannot provide when you are ignoring your customers by sitting in a daily marathon of meetings.


As I mentioned, there are times when holding a meeting is appropriate and beneficial. But for heaven’s sake, when we do hold them, they should be productive.


Don’t waste time rehashing the minutes from the previous meeting. Instead, go into the meeting with a targeted agenda focused on a specific problem, issue or opportunity. Break down the agenda into specific action items and assign them to the appropriate individual or team, being sure to specify an expected completion date.


It is easy to sit in a meeting and hear whining about poor quality, late deliveries, slow sales, etc. Each of these topics is incredibly important, but far too broad to act upon. An action item listed on the meeting minutes to “Increase sales” is NOT an action item. Devising a new marketing promotion, developing a brochure or advertisement, performing a targeted mailing campaign, scheduling training for sales reps or agents, setting up an open house, adding testimonials to the web site, SEO (search engine optimization), enacting a customer appreciation program, participating in a trade show or technical conference, presenting a webinar, issuing a customer satisfaction survey. THOSE are action items that work toward the goal of increasing sales.


Your list of action items can be broken down further into a list(s) of specific tasks and resources needed to accomplish them. The tasks can be organized into a logical sequence and acted upon by the team member assigned with their completion. The manager, supervisor or meeting chair monitors progress of task completion through periodic updates. Keep in mind that it does not necessarily require a “meeting” to receive or report on progress. A simple email or brief conversation does the job just as well. If you are already up to date on progress, then at the next meeting (sorry for use of that four – I mean seven letter word), new action items can be identified and addressed.


Without specific tasks assigned to specific individuals with specific deadlines, it is all too easy to let problems fester and opportunities pass by. Instead of progress, accomplishment and success, we end up in subsequent meetings wasting more time whining about poor quality, late deliveries or slow sales.


I had a problem with my minivan. The heater was not putting out heat. That lack of heat was not the problem, but a symptom of low fluid level. Because the radiator fluid was not reaching the heater core, there was no heat transfer to the air forced through it. The low fluid level was not the problem either, but a symptom of the underlying problem, a leaky radiator. Once I correctly identified the root cause of the problem, the resolution of the problem became obvious.


Replacing the radiator was my action item. To accomplish that action, I had to determine the resources needed (tools, ramps, trouble light, new radiator, hoses, fluid, etc.). Then I had to break it down into tasks such as purchasing required materials, assembling tools, dismantling, installation, reassembly, initial testing for leaks, with added monitoring of antifreeze levels to insure a successful installation.


Granted, it took some time to accomplish all of those tasks, but the tasks got done and the action item was removed from my list. Without breaking down the tasks, I could still be staring at the puddle of radiator fluid pooling under my van (and complaining that my heater doesn’t work).


In essence, what I have been describing is taking a systematic approach to improving the quality of meetings and the way they are conducted; Looking at them as a means of continuous improvement of the organization toward the goals of reduced costs and improved customer satisfaction rather than as a meeting for the sake of meeting.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Don't miss the 2010 National Environmental Health and Safety (NEHS) Conference.

What do Christel House International, Eli Lilly and Company, Temple University, and State Farm Insurance all have in common? First, they consider sustainability as a factor in their supply chains, and second, they are all speaking at the 2010 National Environmental Health and Safety (NEHS) Conference.

The deadline to save $100 on the NEHS Conference has been extended to March 7, 2010. Do not miss this opportunity to attend the only conference that addresses the needs of safety, environmental, and human resources for the graphic communications industry.

In addition to presenting key business issues, the NEHS conference also offers:
  • Pre-conference workshops demonstrating how to implement sustainability best practices
  • Breakout sessions focusing on emerging environmental, safety, and health topics
  • Sustainable Green Printer (SGP) panel sharing their journey of becoming SGP certified
  • Networking opportunities through social events and roundtable discussions

For the complete educational program and event details, check out the NEHS brochure.

National Environmental, Health & Safety Conference
Printing for a Sustainable Future
March 15-17, 2010
Sheraton Indianapolis--City Centre
Indianapolis, Indiana

Plan now to attend the only conference that addresses the needs of safety, environmental, and human resources for the graphic communications industry. Register by February 28 and save $100! Go to www.nehsconference.org/nehs10_site/register.html to find out more ways you can save on your registration.

Brought to you by:
Printing Industries of America
FTA
NAPIM
SGIA

Thursday, February 4, 2010

FTA Great Lakes Group March meeting

The FTA Great Lakes Group (GLG) meeting on March 18th is being held at Harper College at 4:30PM. We have an outstanding lineup of speakers.

Meeting agenda:
Dan Doherty – Prairie State – VP of Manufacturing for a narrow and mid-web printer who will be discussing how they implemented FIRST standards in their facility to improve quality.

Roy Bohnen – Epson Product Specialist – Roy is a leader in color management theory and will be discussing Epson UltraChrome HDR White inkjet proofing.

Ian Hole –VP Market Development, Esko Graphics – will be addressing High Definition Flexo.

Richard Black - All Printing Resources - will give a presentation on G7.

Mary Mekeburg - Social Media Coach - will discuss social media marketing.

The meeting will begin with a tour of the Harper College Graphic Arts facilities.

Location:
1200 W. Algonquin Road • Palatine, IL 60067
Room E-108

Food and refreshments:
Provided courtesy of Dupont, Graymills and All Printing Resources.

We have some great door prizes including a copy of FTA's FIRST book and 2 autographed copies of PIA's book, Common Sense Flexography.

Cost for this event:
$10.00 FTA members and seniors.
$20.00 for non members.
Complimentary for students and faculty.
(Checks payable to FFTA. Proceeds generated go to the FFTA Scholarship fund)

This is a phenomenal value. Attending a technical conference with similar programming could easily cost hundreds of dollars. With such an incredible lineup, this is one meeting you will not want to miss.

Mark your calendar for March 18th. We will see you there.

Please RSVP to david.lanska@yahoo.com.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Standardization of anilox measurement techniques

An article in the December issue of Flexo magazine ( http://www.flexomag.com/ ) entitled "Your Ruler or Mine?" describes the (FQC) Flexo Quality Consortium's latest endeavor, which is to perform gauge studies of the various methodologies used by anilox manufacturers to determine anilox roll cell volume. This study is vital to insuring that printers have good information to work with when trying to match color on press, run repeat print jobs or transfer a print job from one press to another.

Anilox cell volume is a major contributor to determining ink lay down and the consequent print density. It is critical to have accurate cell volume data for proper anilox selection. The problem is that there are multiple methods for determining cell volume and the methods do not always yield the same volume determinations. As a result, one manufacturer's rolls will not necessarily print like anothers, even if the stated cell volumes are identical.

Cell volume refers to the carrying capacity of the microscopic cells on the roll surface. The standard unit of measurement is BCM (Billion Cubic Microns/square inch). BCM essentially looks at how much ink a given cell can carry multiplied by the number of cells occupying a square inch of the roll's surface. The cells act like microscopic measuring cups, which contain a specific, precise amount of ink. The more accurate the measuring cup, the more predictable will be the amount of ink it carries.

Unfortunately, cells produced by lasers do not have perfect wall geometries. There are microscopic variations in wall peaks, contours and wall thicknesses. Even the cell bottoms have variations. This is not an indictment of the anilox manufacturers or the engraving technologies currently in use. It is simply a statement of fact.

Cells have rounded or somewhat rounded bottoms, which makes measurement difficult. Porosity in the ceramic material itself results in variations in depth. Variations in peak formation result from evacuation of debris from the laser engraving process. Additional variation comes as molten ceramic is recast during the formation of adjacent cells. Variation in wall contours come from a combination of porosity and minuscule variations in energy distribution within the laser beam itself, as well as in the delivery of that energy through optics that may have dust or microscratches on their surface. Wear and tear to electronics, as well as mechanical components of the laser and delivery system can also contribute to cell-to-cell variations.

Because of these variations, cell measurement is extremely challenging. Having an industry standard measurement technique would provide a common "language" for describing anilox carrying capacity.

Currently, there are 3 main types of measurement technologies used in anilox manufacture: liquid, optical, and interferometric. Impression tape used for most anilox audits these days makes a microscopic reverse mold of the cells, which can then be evaluated with one of the measurement technologies.

Disposable liquid volume measurement strips represent a variant on the liquid volume method. Liquid volume measurement involves applying a known volume of a liquid to the roll surface, spreading the liquid out across the roll surface, applying a special absorbent paper to the roll face and then measuring the surface area of the 'wet' surface or blot. Computer software then calculates how large the cells would have to be to create a blot of that size with the liquid applied.

Optical measurement involves using a high-powered optic microscope to measure the cell width and depth. Most microscopes currently in use utilize computer software to then calculate volume based on the measurements received.

Interferometry bounces light off the roll surface through special optics. This light creates an interference pattern that the computer software interprets to generate a volume reading.

Each of these systems utilizes a proprietary software package based on independently determined mathematical models. Each has advantages and disadvantages. Each of these systems has the potential to have measurement accuracy affected by system condition and vibration. Measurement0s from each method can be adversely affected by improper operation. Unfortunately, each system has a different level of Repeatability and Reproducibility. In other words, variation from operator to operator and variation in multiple readings produced by the same operator. Ascertaining which system offers the best R&R through gauge study analysis, will go a long way to helping the industry to develop standard measurement criteria.

The variability between systems was highlighted in a study conducted in 2008 inwhich a single banded anilox roll was set to each anilox manufacturer. The manufacturers then measured the roll using their technique of choice. The readings were then compiled by the company that initiated the study. The results were eye opening. Depending on linecount, the variation between manufacturers and methodologies was as much as 40%. When evaluating the results from multiple manufacturers using the same methodologies, evidence strongly suggested the highest R&R coming from interferometrtic measurement. The scientific analysis produced from the FQC study is vital to broadening the industry's understanding of anilox measurement and helping insure printers have good, reliable information to facilitate color-match on press. The FQC deserves a great deal of credit for taking on this daunting, but incredibly important initiative.
To view a listing of blog topics for each month, click on the arrow on the left side of that month.





FTA 50 year logo

FTA 50 year logo
Flexograsphic Technical Association

Followers